Clint Van Zandt - former FBI Criminal Profiler, Hostage Negotiator, and current TV and News Media Crime Analyst

{"contentId":"1917999","authorDomain":"clintvanzandt"}

Who's Responsible for America's financial crisis?

There goes our money!

The finger pointing continues as Congress struggles to sort out the need for an almost $1 trillion dollar bailout of America's major financial institutes. Americans are told that we are on the brink of a major depression, and that the years and years of mistakes, incompetence, greed, and potential graft and fraud on the part of the financial industry, supplemented by Congress' failure to anticipate this financial meltdown, have all culminated in the need to commit more money than has ever been spent at one time by our country. This, we are told, is a last, desperate measure to prop up our faltering financial system before we all line up in the soup lines once again. What Osama ben Laden and other terrorists have not been able to accomplish, the destruction of our economy, may still come to roost, but it will be our own financial institutions, negatively enabled by a Congress currently trusted by very few Americans, that shoot our country in the foot, perhaps crippling us for years to come. Now we appear to have two major challenges: fix the immediate problem and identify and hold responsible those who made and let this happen. If business and Congress were just "simple inept," we need to identify and fire those responsible. If these same leaders, administrators, executives and members of Congress intentionally allowed or made this happen, perhaps for their own financial purposes, we need to investigate and prosecute those who violated the laws of this land and violated the pledges most swore to uphold.

The FBI is our nation's lead investigative agency and is currently involved in the probe of the many firms and agencies that appear to be drowning in bad debt, pulling all of us down with them. Names like Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae, Lehman Brothers, WaMu, and AIG are in the national headlines, this while the FBI is quietly investigating 30 or more firms and agencies for potentially fraudulent activities that may have contributed to our current national financial and housing crisis. Real estate lenders, appraisers and mortgage brokers are also under investigation, this as the FBI and the American public try to understand how someone without a job or adequate credit scores could buy a home worth hundreds of thousands of dollars, taking on a mortgage that the lender had to know they could not handle. Do we need decent housing for every citizen? Yes, but should greed and not an overwhelming sense of concern for their fellow citizen have been the root cause for this mortgage mess, i.e., the reason why these so-called sub-prime and really stupid mortgages were allowed to go through in the first place, and should the individual and corporate greed have resulted in the violation of the laws of this land, then people, probably many people need to go to jail. While investigators are already looking into mortgage related losses of over $1 billion, this is just a drop in the bucket of the potential losses that the American tax payer is being assigned responsibility for. Although we, as citizens are not screaming for blood, we are crying out for justice, justice for every citizen and justice by not rewarding those responsible for this calamity with golden parachutes while many Americans go without a home, a job, and a retirement account.

The FBI and the IRS are charged with this massive investigation, one that will look at dozens of agencies, result in tens of thousands of interviews, and require hundreds of investigators for many months to try to get to the bottom of this mess. Movies have portrayed financial institutions and companies as holding panicky shredding parties as documents critical to any criminal investigations are chopped in to tiny pieces while hard drives are erased or destroyed. In the real world federal investigators will need to issue do not destroy court orders to the agencies and companies under investigation, and to the employees and executives suspected of having played any role in this massive financial disaster. Then the long process of document review and personal interview will need begin, a process that will probably take us well into the next administration, this while the fraud likely continues with greedy hands trying to get their share of the yet to be decided financial bailout. The rich do get richer… It's amazing to most Americans that at this monumental moment of financial and personal crisis, that Congress and our national government leaders still engage in the blame game; who did what, who came to what the meeting and just voted "present," and which party, and party leader, should be held responsible, this all in apparent gamesmanship as the leadership of America is to be decided in less than two months. Why can't once, just once, both parties put aside their mindless political rantings and do what is best for America, partisan politics and personal gain aside? I can't help but think that we need return to the original purpose and position of our founding fathers, this concerning the selection of our national elected representatives. Even in the 21st century we are told that 75% of us dislike or distrust many of our national representatives, believing them to be more interested in themselves and less in us, the people they are suppose to represent. Perhaps we need to limit terms for Congress and the Senate to two terms. Perhaps we should tell every candidate for office: "put your day job on hold, serve your country for a maximum of two terms, and then go home and let another concerned citizen pick up the ball and run with it." It appears that "professional politicians," many of whom need to raise $5,000 a day in contributions to stay in office, simply do not have the best interests of their constituents at heart. After all, this national crisis did not happen overnight.

Most know that we didn't just wake up last week and find that someone had charged $700,000,000,000 to our national credit card. Both the Bush and Clinton administrations, for example, tried to reign in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, but Congress didn't see the need for such action and, therefore, the mess continued to compound itself. Why were our representatives so blind then and so stubborn now? Although there are no federal laws that cover sheer stupidity and gross professional ineptitude, those that lined their pockets while our economy sank, therefore requiring this bailout, need to be ferried out and held responsible. We the people must decide whether the bailout is actually good for America, but, after all, "we" really don't get to decide, it's the men and women in Congress, those who let us get into this mess in the first place that continue to poster and pontificate, covering up their inactions while refusing to accept any personal responsibility for how we got here in the first place. Forty-four percent of Americans are deathly against this bailout, indicating if an agency or individual got into trouble because of stupidly or greed, then those who acted responsible should not have to pay the price for those who knowingly put their finger into this financial mouse trap. While tens of thousands want Congress to slow down before it makes any decision, others believe that the American house of cards is teetering on collapse, while our elected officials continue, like Nero, to fiddle around while we watch our economy burn all around us. Like every other event in history, time will surely tell.

{"contentId":"1917999","authorDomain":"clintvanzandt"}
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.
{"commentId":3219653,"authorDomain":"gmcki2007"}

Dead on article. The American public does not support this "DEAL" nor do we want to see anything similiar to this mess. Congress should look to the past and do what FDR did.

{"commentId":3219653,"threadId":"371665","contentId":"1917999","authorDomain":"gmcki2007"}
    Reply#1 - Tue Sep 30, 2008 7:13 AM EDT
    {"commentId":3219812,"authorDomain":"chelsiebelle"}

    I don't know that I agree with Ms. Gunn. While I certainly and under no circumstances could ever support this "deal," I don't know that compounding upon what FDR did would be good for the country. Isn't there enough regulation on the market as a whole already?

    {"commentId":3219812,"threadId":"371665","contentId":"1917999","authorDomain":"chelsiebelle"}
      Reply#2 - Tue Sep 30, 2008 7:35 AM EDT
      {"commentId":3220380,"authorDomain":"sirdhane"}

      I have to agree with some of what you say, however, Clinton was a big "pusher" in the 1990s which renewed and strengthened the practice of these bad loans to people who should not qualify otherwise. The politically correctness of allowing people to get "homes" when they could not afford them really took off under Clinton.

      {"commentId":3220380,"threadId":"371665","contentId":"1917999","authorDomain":"sirdhane"}
        Reply#3 - Tue Sep 30, 2008 8:29 AM EDT
        {"commentId":3222632,"authorDomain":"drboo"}

        I think we are missing the point of the rejection, by Main Street USA, of the "Bailout". The recently defeated "Bailout" was a decent Plan, but did not contain Guarantees and Investigations/Responsibilities.

        Main Street knows the consequences of not passing a "Bailout", collapse of our economy (?). But a "Bailout" without Investigation and Prosecution of those individuals who created this Mess is unacceptable! We must stop rewarding individuals for their unethical and illegal business practices. If we just "Bailout" the current crisis, what guarantees do we have that Mega-Financial Institutions will not continue their unethical business practices.

        U.S. Citizens are tired of it's Governmental Representatives working for their own personal gains, their Unethical Practices and their Contempt of the American Public.

        Main Street America feels the only way to get the attention of their Governmental Representatives and the Mega-Financial Institutions is to let it all crumble!

        The following are some items we would like to see included in a Bailout Plan:

        1. Investigate and convict CEO's of our Mega-Financial Corporations for Illegal and Unethical Business Practices.

        2. Investigate and convict our Political Representatives for Unethical Practices (gifts from Lobbyists).

        3. Re-establishment of of Banking and Lending Regulations.

        4. Establishment of Congressional and Executive Ethics, (terminate Lobbyists and their Gifts).

        5. Sell-off of Mega-Financial Assets to cover some of the shortfalls.

        6. Assistance for ALL US Citizens who have been hurt by the Unethical Business Practices of our Governmental Representatives and the Mega-Financial Institutions.

        7. Regulations to hold our Congressional and Executive Branches liable for their Actions.

        8. Do we really need $700 Million?

        9. No Unrestricted, lump-sum, Give-A-Way/Bailout Funds.

        I am also hearing a rising swell for the ousting of all Congressional Incumbents in the upcoming elections, and also in Future Elections.

        Let's take our Country Back!

        {"commentId":3222632,"threadId":"371665","contentId":"1917999","authorDomain":"drboo"}
          Reply#4 - Tue Sep 30, 2008 10:38 AM EDT
          {"commentId":3309980,"authorDomain":"tlptulip"}

          The article below is from the New York Times, dated 9 years ago, Sept 30, 1999, written by Steven Holmes. Here's the crux of the article (copied from the 3rd paragraph):

          "Fannie Mae, the nation's biggest underwriter of home mortgages, has been under increasing pressure from the Clinton Administration to expand mortgage loans among low and moderate income people and felt pressure from stock holders to maintain its phenomenal growth in profits."

          Moving onto paragraph 7, "In moving, even tentatively, into this new area of (subprime) lending, Fannie Mae is taking on significantly more risk, which may not pose any difficulties during flush economic times. But the government-subsidized corporation may run into trouble in an economic downturn, prompting a government rescue similar to that of the savings and loan industry in the 1980's."



          Between the easement of the fair lending rules enacted in the 1990s and the repeal of Glass-Steagall Act in November of 1999, our financial system has been doomed ever since. We didn't heed the warnings because we were too busy watching our personal portfolios rise, voting mutual fund proxies to ease investment objectives to achieve higher yields and refinance our mortgages multiple times each year, taking out equity each time. The good times lasted 8 years, until the credit crunch started about 14 months ago. Each of us is responsible for this crisis. When will the media and politicans call all of us out to take responsibility?


          What is Glass-Steagall? It separated commercial and investment banks and founded the FDIC during the Depression.

          As per Wikipedia:

          The argument for preserving Glass-Steagall (as written in 1987):

          1. Conflicts of interest characterize the granting of credit – lending – and the use of credit – investing – by the same entity, which led to abuses that originally produced the Act

          2. Depository institutions possess enormous financial power, by virtue of their control of other people’s money; its extent must be limited to ensure soundness and competition in the market for funds, whether loans or investments.

          3. Securities activities can be risky, leading to enormous losses. Such losses could threaten the integrity of deposits. In turn, the Government insures deposits and could be required to pay large sums if depository institutions were to collapse as the result of securities losses.

          4. Depository institutions are supposed to be managed to limit risk. Their managers thus may not be conditioned to operate prudently in more speculative securities businesses. An example is the crash of real estate investment trusts sponsored by bank holding companies (in the 1970s and 1980s).

          The argument against preserving the Act (as written in 1987):

          1. Depository institutions will now operate in “deregulated” financial markets in which distinctions between loans, securities, and deposits are not well drawn. They are losing market shares to securities firms that are not so strictly regulated, and to foreign financial institutions operating without much restriction from the Act.

          2. Conflicts of interest can be prevented by enforcing legislation against them, and by separating the lending and credit functions through forming distinctly separate subsidiaries of financial firms.

          3. The securities activities that depository institutions are seeking are both low-risk by their very nature, and would reduce the total risk of organizations offering them – by diversification.

          4. In much of the rest of the world, depository institutions operate simultaneously and successfully in both banking and securities markets. Lessons learned from their experience can be applied to our national financial structure and regulation.

          So, how can we learn from this history and fix the serious financial problems this country faces?

          {"commentId":3309980,"threadId":"371665","contentId":"1917999","authorDomain":"tlptulip"}
            Reply#5 - Sat Oct 4, 2008 1:28 PM EDT
            {"commentId":3363045,"authorDomain":"dpeterson08"}

            well the republicans have been in control of the white house and congress for 8 years...democrats didn't take over congress until a little over two years ago...hmmm...what does this sound like to you???

            {"commentId":3363045,"threadId":"371665","contentId":"1917999","authorDomain":"dpeterson08"}
              Reply#6 - Tue Oct 7, 2008 6:26 PM EDT
              {"commentId":3934511,"authorDomain":"tlynch83079"}

              Deja why don't you check out the New York Times archives go to an Article called Fannie Mae Eases Credit To Aid Mortage Lending dated 9/30/99 it clearly states that the Clinton Administration pushed Fannie Mae and other lenders to create more subprime loans and this was easy for them to do due to the fact all loans were government backed with your money.  All check out the end of the article Peter Wallison's comment he obviously saw this coming but did anyone listen to him or others.  Then lets take a trip to an article in the New York Times dated 9/11/03 The headline is New agency proposed to oversee Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae.  Go to the end of the article see the quote from Barney Frank (Democrat) Is this guy just plain stupid? No he's just greedy!!! Check out how much money he's received from Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae!!!  Are you mad now? If not you should be.  Maybe Bush has'nt been the best president but he's not been as bad as everyone thinks and this poor economy is definitely not all to blame on his administration he's only tried to fix it as stated in this article only to get blocked by the people we elect to congress who are to childish and greedy to get along to get America back on the right track!!!

              {"commentId":3934511,"threadId":"371665","contentId":"1917999","authorDomain":"tlynch83079"}
                Reply#7 - Thu Nov 6, 2008 9:26 AM EST
                {"canLink":false,"threadId":"371665","isPrivate":false}
                Leave a Comment:
                You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                {"threadId":"371665","contentId":"1917999"}
                Start TrackingStart Tracking
                Stop TrackingStop Tracking
                RSS feedSyndicate this contentRecent Articles & Seeds
                Clint Van Zandt's Latest Comments
                Comments & Feedback
                – Show More