Clint Van Zandt - former FBI Criminal Profiler, Hostage Negotiator, and current TV and News Media Crime Analyst

{"contentId":"2542581","authorDomain":"clintvanzandt"}

Teenager weds Father of missing 5-year-old Haleigh Cummings

Missing Haleigh Cummings

Misty and Ron Cummings on NBC's Today Show

In a wedding not made in heaven, at least one that their local pastor refused to sanction in his church because of his disagreement with the proposed relationship, Ronald Cummings (25) married his current teen-age girlfriend, Misty Croslin (17), after becoming engaged just four days earlier. Evidently Misty is but one of a number of Ron's believed recent underage girlfriends. A notary public preformed the back yard marriage that took place while over 100 Florida area law enforcement officers continued their search for missing 5-year-old Haleigh Cummings. The child has not been seen since the evening of February 9-10, 2009, when the then 17-year-old live-in girlfriend allegedly noticed Haleigh was not on her mattress on the floor a few feet away from the bed then shared by Misty and Ron Cummings' son, Ron, Jr.

Appearing on NBC's 'The Today Show' Friday morning, evidently the genesis of their honeymoon trip to New York City, the couple told Today's Meredith Vieira that they had both passed (FBI) polygraph tests concerning the disappearance of Haleigh (for those true believers in polygraphs, see my article "Do Lie Detectors Lie? at http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7992482/). Misty, however, was unable to explain the changes and inconsistencies in her story of the morning Haleigh disappeared. Her latest version offered during her over 30 hours of interviews suggests as follows:

Misty had put Haleigh to bed at 8 o'clock. She then washed their blankets, and after that was done, she put Haleigh's blanket over her. "She was sleeping when I put her blanket on her," said Misty. "She was in her bed, and it was about 10 o'clock. I finally laid down and went to sleep. I woke up at 3. I got up to use the bathroom, and I noticed the kitchen light was on. I walked through the kitchen, and that's when I noticed the back door was open. So I run back to my bedroom to get my phone to call Ronald. That's when I noticed Haleigh was gone."

New husband Ron, the man who had previously referred to his teenage bride sitting next to him as his "dumb ***** girlfriend," appeared overly smug when he said he didn't know what happened to his daughter as, "I was at work," grinning over what he appeared to believe was the perfect alibi. As far as the focus on him and the new Mrs. Cummings, he said "nobody's business what I do with my personal life." I would be very glad to disagree with him on this fact should it be determined that the children in his home, to include Haleigh and Ron Jr., had being abused by the occupants of that trailer. Another interesting aspect of the interview was the apparent lack of any physical indication of the usual affection exhibited between newlyweds (like hand holding). They came off looking more like a strange father-daughter relationship, one in which the daughter was both emotionally and physically dominated by the father figure.

Investigators continue to question Misty's version of what happened the night Haleigh disappeared and Misty, for her part, has walked out of law enforcement interviews when she considered their questions to be rude. Haleigh Cummings' new stepmother has not been ruled out as a suspect and investigators point to her inability to explain in her "Today" interview what happened the night Haleigh disappeared as an example of what detectives have faced for weeks."Our interviews with her have been pretty much like what you saw on the "Today Show," said the investigator. "We've confronted her with her inconsistencies and America (now has) a sample of our interviews with her."

As indicated in my initial Newsvine review of this case (http://clintvanzandt.newsvine.com/_news/2009/02/16/2441536-update-teenage-caretaker-of-missing-5-year-old-florida-girl-says-i-didnt-do-it), Ron Cummings and the biological mother of both Haleigh and Ron, Jr., were involved in a custody battle concerning their two children at the time of Haleigh's disappearance, one that continues today. Crystal Sheffield, the biolobical mother of the children, has indicated through her attorney that Cummings has been abusive and has allegedly struck both children. Let's see; he's allegedly been abusive to his former wife, he is alleged to have abused both of his children, he has issues of substance abuse, and the court still awarded him custody of the children. What's wrong with this picture?

Meanwhile investigators must consider at least four explanations for the disappearance of the little girl who was afraid of the dark, to include: being kidnapped by an unknown child predator (all such known individuals in the local area have been identified and accounted for); a mistaken kidnapping related to the residents who had recently moved from the trailer home (a local pastor and his family, therefore unlikely); she was kidnapped to punish Ronald Cummings due to a personal vendetta with another (he has been involved in drugs and a drug related kidnapping would not, unfortunately, be unusual); she was kidnapped by someone known to Ronald and Misty, perhaps a friend or relative who had recently visited the home (while this has been explored, no known strong suspect continues to capture law enforcement interest); or she died of injuries sustained in the home and the report of her suspected kidnapping is a cover-up to hide the actual reason for her absence from the home.

Evidently Misty has not heard Oprah discuss the alleged beating sustained by pop star Rihanna (real name Robyn Fenty) at the hands of her boyfriend Chris Brown, this when Oprah rightfully said love should not hurt you and "if he hits you once, he'll hit you again." Ron Cummings has allegedly been angry and physically abusive toward the mother of missing Haleigh and Florida Department of Children and Family Services have investigated the current Cummings home. Meanwhile the reward for information concerning the missing girl has risen to $35,767. Ron Cummings appears to refute the story allegedly told by his son that a mysterious man dressed in black had stolen Haleigh, suggesting that story had been made up by the boy's mom and Fox News personality Geraldo Rivera, the latter of whom Cummings had previously excluded from his property due to a conflict between the two.

When asked why he had married Misty, I expected Cummings to say something that included a statement of his love for his teenage bride, but he only said that (marriage) was what Haleigh would have wanted. Noting that he has allegedly been through a number of teenage girlfriends, Misty would be wise to listen to the pastor who cautioned against the wedding and Oprah's wise advice. And why now, you must ask yourself; why engaged and then married a few days later? Most know that a wife and husband cannot be compelled to testify against each other. Could this marriage be one of legal convenience, even legal necessity for one or both of the newlyweds? Or could marriage be "part of the deal" for Misty? We just don't know.

Due to her age, Misty's parents had to provide their legal consent to the marriage and now the honeymooners are enjoying New York City as investigators look through the swamps of Florida for the missing child. Something just doesn't make sense here, but there is always some type of logic and reason in chaos and I believe that Misty holds the key to this case, one investigators are trying to shake loose. Meanwhile Ron Cummings continues to have that smug look on his face that appears to suggest he knows something we don't, and at this point, he may just be correct.

Related Articles
Still-missing Haleigh has a new stepmomAssociated PressFri Mar 13187Comments
{"contentId":"2542581","authorDomain":"clintvanzandt"}
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.
Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 4
{"commentId":5915902,"authorDomain":"jbirdncsmiles"}

I think law enforcement should "rip apart" every shred of both Ron & Misty's private life. At this point neither one of them (especially Misty) deserves a private life. Since they both appear to be "un-educated", for lack of a better choice of words, the truth should not be too far behind. As for their paid for "honeymoon" trip to NY, well another example of their morals (or lack of)!

{"commentId":5915902,"threadId":"526744","contentId":"2542581","authorDomain":"jbirdncsmiles"}
  • 3 votes
Reply#1 - Fri Mar 13, 2009 10:43 AM EDT
{"commentId":5921615,"authorDomain":"calbarran"}
I think law enforcement should "rip apart" every shred of both Ron & Misty's private life.

So do I, their story does not makes sense and neither do their actions right now. Getting married would be the last thing on my mind if my child was missing. Sounds very fishy to me.

{"commentId":5921615,"threadId":"526744","contentId":"2542581","authorDomain":"calbarran"}
  • 3 votes
#1.1 - Fri Mar 13, 2009 3:17 PM EDT
{"commentId":5921628,"authorDomain":"bahoward"}

All should note: In Florida it is a felony for a person over the age of 23 to engage in a sexual relationship with someone who is 16 or 17. When that person reaches 18 years of age, they may consent with whomever...

The fact that they are married stops that legal battle. The rape charge that is.. And I am sure he doesn’t want to go to jail and I am sure that he might be compelled to overlook some minor inconsistencies in her statement due to his legal issues.

Now there is no proof that he has engaged in such a relationship with her, just speculation and the obvious rush marriage.

Innocent until proven guilty!

{"commentId":5921628,"threadId":"526744","contentId":"2542581","authorDomain":"bahoward"}
    #1.2 - Fri Mar 13, 2009 3:18 PM EDT
    {"commentId":5924245,"authorDomain":"brianjwood"}

    They are exempt from the law because he dated misty before he turned 25.. law states 24 and a 16/17yo.. but the question is.. how long have they been dating? reports say 6 years.. now THAT isnt covered by law.

    {"commentId":5924245,"threadId":"526744","contentId":"2542581","authorDomain":"brianjwood"}
      #1.3 - Fri Mar 13, 2009 5:20 PM EDT
      {"commentId":5925452,"authorDomain":"txcat"}

      I read they've been dating six months, not six years.

      {"commentId":5925452,"threadId":"526744","contentId":"2542581","authorDomain":"txcat"}
        #1.4 - Fri Mar 13, 2009 6:30 PM EDT
        {"commentId":5956858,"authorDomain":"waldenlane74"}

        Can we all agree that Meredith did a phenomenal job!!!! Knowing that she, (Meredith) is a mother and was able to keep her composure through the entire interview was amazing. I thought that Misty was about to "spill the beans" when Meredith asked the trying question as to why there were inconsistencies in her story....am I the only one who noticed the awkward silence and glance toward Ronald before answering? Excellent job Meredith, excellent job!!!!!

        {"commentId":5956858,"threadId":"526744","contentId":"2542581","authorDomain":"waldenlane74"}
          #1.5 - Sun Mar 15, 2009 8:55 PM EDT
          Reply
          {"commentId":5918139,"authorDomain":"lbenthin"}

          is anyone else concerned about the fact that Ron is into young girls and his very young daughter is missing? Kind of a coincidence i think! Wouldn't rule out that he is a pedophile and married his young girlfriend so she wouldn't be able to testify against him!

          {"commentId":5918139,"threadId":"526744","contentId":"2542581","authorDomain":"lbenthin"}
          • 2 votes
          Reply#2 - Fri Mar 13, 2009 12:36 PM EDT
          {"commentId":5926028,"authorDomain":"pointforpoke"}

          being married doesn't stop someone from testifying against them.

          {"commentId":5926028,"threadId":"526744","contentId":"2542581","authorDomain":"pointforpoke"}
            #2.1 - Fri Mar 13, 2009 7:09 PM EDT
            {"commentId":5940807,"authorDomain":"lkessler41"}

            The new stepmom has an awful lot of questions to answer. And how creepy that this man thinks a 17 year old would make a good stepmom? Especially in light of the young woman's possible involvement? Good grief--you'd think he'd have 2 cents worth of common sense upstairs...

            {"commentId":5940807,"threadId":"526744","contentId":"2542581","authorDomain":"lkessler41"}
            • 2 votes
            #2.2 - Sat Mar 14, 2009 9:04 PM EDT
            Reply
            {"commentId":5918170,"authorDomain":"lizSnewsvi"}

            Why did dad have custody of this child in the first place if he was sleeping with teenage girls? Also why were the children sleeping with this girlfriend or even in the same room? Does anyone else seem to think something is mighty strange here besides me?

            {"commentId":5918170,"threadId":"526744","contentId":"2542581","authorDomain":"lizSnewsvi"}
            • 1 vote
            Reply#3 - Fri Mar 13, 2009 12:38 PM EDT
            {"commentId":5918276,"authorDomain":"loocloo"}

            Who paid for their trip anyway? The "Today" show??

            He said the focus should be on his daughter but he's in NY...and he's getting married all of the sudden...to a freaking 17 yr old!

            {"commentId":5918276,"threadId":"526744","contentId":"2542581","authorDomain":"loocloo"}
            • 2 votes
            Reply#4 - Fri Mar 13, 2009 12:43 PM EDT
            {"commentId":5925459,"authorDomain":"jbirdncsmiles"}

            To CL in Jax, FL Don't you mean "Who paid for their honeymoon"? At first I was angry at the Today show for financing their big time in the city, but then after reviewing the clip this morning with Meredith it was evident that they pretty much hung their own selves. Bravo! Money well spent!!! If there was ever a doubt in anyones mind of their innocence I think all is clear now. I give the detectives credit for knowing exactly what they are doing, wait & see. In the meanwhile Child Protective Services should pick up Ron's son - he doesn't deserve him.

            {"commentId":5925459,"threadId":"526744","contentId":"2542581","authorDomain":"jbirdncsmiles"}
            • 1 vote
            #4.1 - Fri Mar 13, 2009 6:30 PM EDT
            Reply
            {"commentId":5918302,"authorDomain":"jenndavismk"}

            I myself am looking for my missing 6 year old daughter. (missing since 8/17/08 in Grand Junction Colorado--parental abduction) I would not even consider marrying my boyfriend (common law husband) of 8years in the midst of searching for our daughter. Our "private life" no longer exists as we have opened our doors and home and everything to anybody willing to help in our search for our little girl.

            If Ron & Misty got engaged and married that fast I feel they have something to hide. Why are they enjoying New York and leaving others to search for Haliegh?? Why are they planning a wedding and having a wedding and probably a reception while others are searching for Haleigh? What do they know that the rest of us dont? Did I understand correctly that Child Protective Services had investigated this man previously for violence against Halieghs mother and recently investigated him in that trailor?

            I am sorry but when a child goes missing, the family no longer has much in the way of privacy. I do not mean to be rude but if you ask for the nation to help you, you are not going to have much in the way of private moments. In order to find the child, police and searchers need to know basically everything and have access to as much of the family as possible. When you are making the choices you are making, yes your private life is going to be put out on display. Why the heck are you getting married and celebrating when your daughter is missing for a month and you have no clue who took her or if she is even alive? It just seems very odd to me!

            {"commentId":5918302,"threadId":"526744","contentId":"2542581","authorDomain":"jenndavismk"}
            • 1 vote
            Reply#5 - Fri Mar 13, 2009 12:44 PM EDT
            {"commentId":5918938,"authorDomain":"redheadedsc"}

            I am so sorry to hear about your missing 6 year old daughter. I will keep you in my prayers. My heart goes out to you sweetie. God help you, your boyfriend and your daughter through this heartbreaking time.

            {"commentId":5918938,"threadId":"526744","contentId":"2542581","authorDomain":"redheadedsc"}
            • 1 vote
            #5.1 - Fri Mar 13, 2009 1:16 PM EDT
            {"commentId":5919725,"authorDomain":"ophelianomore"}

            I am sorry too - I also have children and I can't even imagine what you are going through. I hope you get her back soon!

            {"commentId":5919725,"threadId":"526744","contentId":"2542581","authorDomain":"ophelianomore"}
            • 1 vote
            #5.2 - Fri Mar 13, 2009 1:51 PM EDT
            {"commentId":5920933,"authorDomain":"ajhamby4"}

            JenniferMystics Mommy -

            How can you be searching for child involved in a parent abduction who is 6 years old while having an 8 year relationship with your current "common law husband"?

            {"commentId":5920933,"threadId":"526744","contentId":"2542581","authorDomain":"ajhamby4"}
              #5.3 - Fri Mar 13, 2009 2:48 PM EDT
              {"commentId":5922010,"authorDomain":"AmethystWoman"}

              I am very concerned esp after 'rewatching' the tape of the interview with Meredith V. on the today show. When it was on tv, I was too far away to watch their eyes, but on the tape, there are things that make me question.

              For example, he said about their wedding "I think that my little girl would have wanted it." Why is he speaking of her "in the past". As if he knows she is gone and dead. Wouldn't a parent, who's daughter has ONLY BEEN MISSING FOR WEEKS be saying something more like "I know she'll be happy when she gets home" or "I love Misty and she is helping me make it thru this ordeal and I know Misty will be happy too." He never said anything about loving her and him talking about her in the "past" soooo quickly - within WEEKS - is very frightening to me. You can't plan what will come out of your mouth. I think the natural thing to say at this point is to talk IN THE PRESENT...not like he has already accepted the fact that she is dead...unless he knows.

              I assume his whereabouts between being seen at work and the time he arrived at home has been closely scrutinized. I also wonder about the timing of "washing blankets". Sorry, but they don't strike me as the neatest or cleanest folk - neither am I for that matter, but this I know. Even Oprah probably doesn't wash her blankets very often. When was the last time YOU washed your blankets. The timing of doing that seems odd - and means that the little girl, who was afraid of the dark was put to bed with NO blanket. I am a survivor of childhood abuse and to this day, even when it's warm out, I can't sleep without a blanket...ask anyone who has been abused and I think it's safe to assume with his drug use and previous assaultive behavior, that this little girl lived in a not very safe environment - probably with at least, yelling a lot. At the minimum. At the maximum, well, yeah, his proclivity to younger women is suspect.

              and now one more thing...watch the video. I have heard that when people are lying, their eyes go to the left. watch the video. It is a close up on HIM at the end when he is asked what else he wants to say. When he mentions "if his daughter is out there watching, he loves her" his eyes go immediately to the left as they do several times during this last statement. Watch HER when she is being asked questions, hers do too. I dont' really know a lot about this phenomenon, but I have heard it is just a reflex and pretty difficult to control. His body language is suspect to me with his arms crossed across his chest the entire time - a stance of self-protection and SHE never once makes eye contact with Meredith. It is clear that Meredith is uncomfortable with the interview.

              Personally, I wonder...if he had gotten home from work, was angry about something, hurt her - probably killed her accidentally, and disposed of her body using the blanket. Of course, her saying she was washing it allows for vomit or whatever to be removed without suspect and that they together concocted this story. I think he was arriving home from disposing of her body when she "called him" and that makes the 911 timeline work.

              I am sorry if they are innocent...I think everything about this story points to them and it's not like we haven't seen this kind of thing over and over and over again. he is a drug abuser apparently as stated in an article, potentially abused his past wife - which makes you wonder why HE has custody instead of her - unless his ex is also a drug abuser. it seems like they are being "handled" with kid gloves because they are not the sharpest knives in the drawer...or maybe the police are just waiting coyly for them to mess up. Clearly, they got married for some reason other than "love". if you were asked why you just got married, wouldn't the word love be in your answer somewhere?

              I hope I am wrong. I think I am right. Watch their eyes in this interview. They are lying. I hope this video is scrutinized by the police. Very sad for a beautiful little girl who didn't ask for this kind of a life. I hope she turns up to be with the mother protecting her from her abusive dad... I wish someone had been in the little girls life to protect her. I really don't believe a little girl afraid of the dark would go to sleep without a blanket. do you? I think the truth will come out soon and Meredith with then be able to say what she really felt about the interview. she was clearly having trouble "feeling for them". I think she knew they were lying. She was sitting right there. when people can't make eye contact, something is wrong!

              I wish it were me...but I'm afraid not. too many signs.

              {"commentId":5922010,"threadId":"526744","contentId":"2542581","authorDomain":"AmethystWoman"}
                #5.4 - Fri Mar 13, 2009 3:36 PM EDT
                {"commentId":6246053,"authorDomain":"wutopolis"}

                JenniferMystics Mommy -

                How can you be searching for child involved in a parent abduction who is 6 years old while having an 8 year relationship with your current "common law husband"?

                How cruel can you be? Check your facts before insinuating that Jennifer is a lair.

                Name: Mystic Dawn Salazar

                From: Grand Junction, CO

                Height: 3'3

                Weight: 35 lbs

                Sex: Female

                Race: Biracial

                Eye Color: Green

                Hair Color: Light Brown

                Date of Birth: May 23, 2002

                Date of Disappearance: Aug 17, 2008

                Additional Information: She is in the company of her non custodial father Enrique Arreolo-Lopez and his wife Melissa Arreolo-Lopez. They are traveling in a 2000 gold color Chrysler Voyager van bearing Colorado license plate 355SGZ.

                {"commentId":6246053,"threadId":"526744","contentId":"2542581","authorDomain":"wutopolis"}
                  #5.5 - Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:53 PM EDT
                  Reply
                  {"commentId":5918518,"authorDomain":"TomsTee"}

                  Before his daughter can tell someone at school about pedophile daddy, she disappears with the help of his newly married juvenile girlfriend. Now she can't be compelled to testify against him. Not a bad idea for an Idiot, Trailer trash, kid loving, piece of crap.

                  {"commentId":5918518,"threadId":"526744","contentId":"2542581","authorDomain":"TomsTee"}
                    Reply#6 - Fri Mar 13, 2009 12:55 PM EDT
                    {"commentId":5918619,"authorDomain":"crazydaisy-5"}

                    I agree with Janette, every part of their private life (as of the time of Haleigh's disappreance) should and will be public. As a parent and grandparent I would want it no other way. I can very well be that they are not as un-educated as they put on. This marriage can be for legal purposes, like not being able to testify against one another. Who knows I just feel for the children who are made to suffer their parents sometimes warped reasonings.

                    {"commentId":5918619,"threadId":"526744","contentId":"2542581","authorDomain":"crazydaisy-5"}
                    • 1 vote
                    Reply#7 - Fri Mar 13, 2009 1:00 PM EDT
                    {"commentId":5918739,"authorDomain":"redheadedsc"}

                    What the heck is going on? Has everyone gone crazy!!! Look at this crap - marrying a 17 year old girl while his child has been missing for over a month? This is a definite sign that there is something very shady in this mix. As it has been pointed out that a wife and/or husband cannot testify against each other, if they are innocent from all wrongdoing - why would they do this? Why not wait until the little girl is found? This is not a time for selfish wims for these two. These two are drawing more attention to themselves when the attention should be on finding Haleigh? Don't tell me this is another sick situation like Caley Anthony from Orlando! People if you don't want to take care of your children either don't have them or let someone adopt them and give them a loving, good home to grow up in. What is up with this world when people are allowed to throw away children like trash!!!! EVERYBODY - Children do not ask to be born.

                    {"commentId":5918739,"threadId":"526744","contentId":"2542581","authorDomain":"redheadedsc"}
                    • 1 vote
                    Reply#8 - Fri Mar 13, 2009 1:05 PM EDT
                    Reply
                    {"commentId":5918920,"authorDomain":"amylane"}

                    I am trying to understand how a father can possibly focus on a wedding, a trip to NY, or anything else when his daughter is missing. IF what Misty says is true, then one could assume she is in danger. In view of Ron's drug-dealer relationships of the past, she could be a victim of revenge against him. If the custody battle was a concern, then he would be searching wildly anywhere Haleigh's mother frequented. It just doesn't make sense. Ron spoke about Haleigh in PAST TENSE when he answered the question of why he would marry Misty now amongst all the searching for his daughter. His response was "It's what Haleigh would have wanted." WOULD HAVE???? Meaning she isn't with us any longer? Why hasn't anyone picked up on this one in the media? And the pathetic look on Misty's face every time a camera is near --- the t-shirt with Haleigh's picture and "Have you seen . . . " and the buttons .... all reminiscent of the previous amber alert that resulted in finding the remains of Caylee Anthony. Her pathetic mother donned in t-shirts with her picture, and wearing a near-identical look to the one on Misty --- HELLOOOOO is anyone noticing? Urghhh! I am so frustrated. I don't care if Misty "passed" a polygraph. She probably needed a drug test first to be sure she wasn't so sedate that she couldn't be triggered on the polygraph. I just think it's very, very fishy.

                    {"commentId":5918920,"threadId":"526744","contentId":"2542581","authorDomain":"amylane"}
                      Reply#9 - Fri Mar 13, 2009 1:14 PM EDT
                      {"commentId":5919110,"authorDomain":"redheadedsc"}

                      thank you amy lane!! amen !

                      {"commentId":5919110,"threadId":"526744","contentId":"2542581","authorDomain":"redheadedsc"}
                        #9.1 - Fri Mar 13, 2009 1:23 PM EDT
                        {"commentId":5922415,"authorDomain":"AmethystWoman"}

                        read what I say above. I am with you both. Glad you noticed the "past tense" comment too. they aren't even doing a believable job of making believe they are innocent.

                        who is it that said "stupid is as stupid does". oh, right, Forrest Gump!

                        I think the police know it was them and are just waiting for them to screw up. Or maybe if you are dumb enough and drugged up enough, YOU CAN pass a polygraph. OH, BTW, the POLICE aren't saying they passed...they are. And the police can't tell us they are lying because polygraph is priviledged and NOT admissable in court. They have to wait without tipping their hats I think. We all need to remember, the stats say, when a child is missing, the parents are the first to be suspected...and it's that way for a reason. You are right, we have seen that look going all the way back to Susan years ago after drowning her kids.

                        There is a line in the movie parenthood that you need a license to own a dog, a license to fish and a license to drive a car - but any old ##$%^& can have a child. Today on the today show is the first I have heard of this story...and sorry to say, my very first impression is "it was them". or at least him...and she is too scared to say it. I wonder if anyone has checked her for bruises? she may have been forced to marry him. Even his own church wouldn't perform the ceremony. Someone who knows this couple knows it was them...why are they not speaking up. OR maybe they are.... UGH. PEOPLE...stop killling your kids. What is up with america these days. This is Ugly! again, I hope I am wrong...I hope her real mom grabbed her and has her in a safehouse somewhere. Doesn't sound like this child ever knew very much safety in life. That is the saddest part. Another child who has fallen thru the cracks. He has been investigated already in the past..why is nobody saying that?

                        {"commentId":5922415,"threadId":"526744","contentId":"2542581","authorDomain":"AmethystWoman"}
                          #9.2 - Fri Mar 13, 2009 3:55 PM EDT
                          {"commentId":6588046,"authorDomain":"godiva615"}

                          Amy, I must agree with you regarding the polygraph test. I do think both are not being truthful and you have a point as to why Mitzy may have passed. If you are under the influence of certain drugs you have no emotion. The test is based on emotion and reactions. The child probably was comatose when they tested her. Another thing, I always suspected if a person has no guilt at all they may be capable of passing it. I am sure they both know what happened. I feel for the child. Whatever happened she did not deserve it. What you do in the dark will always come out in the light.

                          In the beginning of the search, It was reported that the search dog traced Haleighs scent from the trailer to the lake and back to the trailer. I feel bad for her biological mother.

                          {"commentId":6588046,"threadId":"526744","contentId":"2542581","authorDomain":"godiva615"}
                            #9.3 - Mon Apr 20, 2009 2:06 PM EDT
                            Reply
                            {"commentId":5919053,"authorDomain":"apuwani"}

                            These poor children didn't have a chance from the start, mom lost custody for being negligent, and dad likes young girls. And what about the new step-mommy's parents condoning a marriage to an abusive older man, they are a whole family of trailer trash in my opinion. I couldn't imagine losing one of my children and marry and honeymooning in New York or any place else a short one month later. These two idiots seem to be enjoying this situation a little too much. Somethings not right here.

                            {"commentId":5919053,"threadId":"526744","contentId":"2542581","authorDomain":"apuwani"}
                              Reply#10 - Fri Mar 13, 2009 1:21 PM EDT
                              {"commentId":5919401,"authorDomain":"dyxy"}

                              I don't know about you guys, but it REALLY creeps me wout that the father said 'Haliegh WOULD HAVE WANTED IT.' That is almost a clear indication that this 5 year old is no longer on this earthly plain...

                              Thank you Ame, I just now read your comment. I am glad to see I wasn't the only one who picked up on the creepiness of that statement. Something smells fishy, here...

                              {"commentId":5919401,"threadId":"526744","contentId":"2542581","authorDomain":"dyxy"}
                                Reply#11 - Fri Mar 13, 2009 1:37 PM EDT
                                {"commentId":5919421,"authorDomain":"hfoust"}

                                this is my first comment on this case...they dont want their private moments on national TV and yet they invite the media to the wedding.. go figure... i guess it must be a white trash thing but who wears dark sunglasses when repeating your wedding vows not to mention he wasnt even looking misty in the eye anyways but the last thing i want to say is if Ron has been out of work for a month now how is he able to: drive to hours for a tatoo,buy a wedding ring, get his truck decked out with messages on front and back windows, get marriage liscence, his girlfriend to get hair and nails done,buy a new dress, both to travel to new york??? they both just dont look as devestated as you would be if you lost a child

                                {"commentId":5919421,"threadId":"526744","contentId":"2542581","authorDomain":"hfoust"}
                                  Reply#12 - Fri Mar 13, 2009 1:38 PM EDT
                                  {"commentId":5919638,"authorDomain":"ophelianomore"}

                                  This whole thing is ridiculous. I felt as soon as the story broke that this is exactly like the Caley Anthony circus. Apuwani, you are right - this is just a big old chain of fools. I am sure the investigators know/suspect far more than they are letting on - it is only a matter of time before these idiots get caught. Everything is traceable now, even if it takes some time to trace. Ron and Misty Cummings make me sick - I have a little girl about Haleigh's age, and there is no way I could function not knowing where she was, much less get married and go on a honeymoon. Amy Lane, you are so right about Ron referring to Haleigh in the past tense - that shows knowledge and acceptance of death. I think he and his little bride are ignorant sociopaths covering up something horrible.

                                  {"commentId":5919638,"threadId":"526744","contentId":"2542581","authorDomain":"ophelianomore"}
                                    Reply#13 - Fri Mar 13, 2009 1:48 PM EDT
                                    {"commentId":5919842,"authorDomain":"tanya-guti"}

                                    I can not imagine a situation were the parents of the child would be giving up the serch and going on with life before the police. My goodenss there are stilll 100 police searching swamps for thier child and they are having a weding and honeymooning.

                                    {"commentId":5919842,"threadId":"526744","contentId":"2542581","authorDomain":"tanya-guti"}
                                      Reply#14 - Fri Mar 13, 2009 1:57 PM EDT
                                      {"commentId":5919990,"authorDomain":"bitsyhealey"}

                                      what strikes me as odd is that Misty says she WASHED THE BLANKETS and put the washed blanket on Haleigh 2 hours after putting her to bed. Who washes blankets at 8 oclock at night, then puts a child to bed without their blanket? That is very fishy to me. Also wonder if they got married to make a better case for keeping the small son and/or testifying against each other.

                                      {"commentId":5919990,"threadId":"526744","contentId":"2542581","authorDomain":"bitsyhealey"}
                                        Reply#15 - Fri Mar 13, 2009 2:04 PM EDT
                                        Reply
                                        {"commentId":5920075,"authorDomain":"conniem239"}

                                        I think you people are too quick to judge people. Obviously you don't remember 2005, Jessica Lunsford, who lived very close to where Haleigh's family is located. There was tons of speculation about her family too, and so much emphasis that they missed finding the killer, who was on the same street. These pedophiles seem to seek out these poor kids in trailers and in low income houses because they generally live nearby and the law usually concentrates on the family instead of door to door searches. Haleighs dad is very young too..it doesn't make you a pediphile to be attracted to someone a few years younger than yourself. As for them getting married so quickly...don't rule out the main reason MOST people decide on a quick wedding...which is an unplanned pregnancy. I don't know this family, but when I see either of them, or their family members, I don't doubt their story, just as I didn't doubt Jessica Lundsford's family. There wasn't a doubt in my mind about Casey Anthony or even Susan Smith---in my mind, you can tell when people are lying. I just hope it isn't too late for Haleigh.

                                        {"commentId":5920075,"threadId":"526744","contentId":"2542581","authorDomain":"conniem239"}
                                          Reply#16 - Fri Mar 13, 2009 2:08 PM EDT
                                          {"commentId":5925705,"authorDomain":"jbirdncsmiles"}

                                          To CMT-960431 ARE YOU FOR REAL? However, I too hope its not too late for Haleigh.

                                          {"commentId":5925705,"threadId":"526744","contentId":"2542581","authorDomain":"jbirdncsmiles"}
                                          • 1 vote
                                          #16.1 - Fri Mar 13, 2009 6:45 PM EDT
                                          {"commentId":5933575,"authorDomain":"katbob32"}

                                          'a few years older'? try 8 years older , that's not 'a few'

                                          {"commentId":5933575,"threadId":"526744","contentId":"2542581","authorDomain":"katbob32"}
                                            #16.2 - Sat Mar 14, 2009 11:20 AM EDT
                                            {"commentId":5933890,"authorDomain":"jmg0201"}

                                            I'm not so sure, after knowing what I do about their lifestyle, that this couple would get married just because she's pregnant.

                                            As much as I hope and pray for Haleigh's safe return, I fear the worst. The Elizabeth Smart outcomes in these scenarios are unfortunately few and far between.

                                            {"commentId":5933890,"threadId":"526744","contentId":"2542581","authorDomain":"jmg0201"}
                                              #16.3 - Sat Mar 14, 2009 11:40 AM EDT
                                              {"commentId":5976446,"authorDomain":"admin-105"}

                                              CMT I am sorry if a guy that is 25 and interested in young ladies as of 17 that stinks pedifile to me. Second, Why the hell are they on a so called honey moon when his child is missing?? The worst thing is the guy Ron does not seem to broken up about his child being missing. Something is wrong with that picture. As for the mother of his so called new bride, how can she allow her child to be with an older guy like that?? I would not let no allow my 17 year old to be with an older guy like that? Where are the morals? 18 considered an adult not 17 and really she don't even look 17.

                                              And all he had to say was his daughter would of wanted it like that. I don't think so. I really think that they both are guilty!!

                                              {"commentId":5976446,"threadId":"526744","contentId":"2542581","authorDomain":"admin-105"}
                                                #16.4 - Mon Mar 16, 2009 9:07 PM EDT
                                                Reply
                                                {"commentId":5920110,"authorDomain":"denise-lonestar"}

                                                Now that "lolita" is married to the dad, she can not testify against him OR vice versa. This smells bad, ALL THE WAY AROUND!! Anyone, and I mean anyone, who knows anything about body language..these 2 are G U I L T Y.....

                                                {"commentId":5920110,"threadId":"526744","contentId":"2542581","authorDomain":"denise-lonestar"}
                                                  Reply#17 - Fri Mar 13, 2009 2:09 PM EDT
                                                  Reply
                                                  {"commentId":5920251,"authorDomain":"morgaine101"}

                                                  My very first thought was, 'They married so they cannot testify against each other.'

                                                  How sickening; how sad.

                                                  {"commentId":5920251,"threadId":"526744","contentId":"2542581","authorDomain":"morgaine101"}
                                                    Reply#18 - Fri Mar 13, 2009 2:16 PM EDT
                                                    {"commentId":5920442,"authorDomain":"denise-lonestar"}

                                                    I hate to say this folks, but she has been missing for over a month. She's not coming back! Polygraph's are net even admissable in court and they are very easy to full. Anyone who thinks these 2 trailer trash a**holes are innocent, well I have 2 acres oceanview in Arizona, you can have..cheap!!.

                                                    Come on people, get a grip on reality. 2+2 DOES NOT equal 5...

                                                    This whole case makes me sick, just as Caylee Anthony, Susan Smith's children,,Andrea Yates..and the list goes on and on..

                                                    Please do not give these 2 monsters ANY SYMPATHY,,,may they rot in hell!!

                                                    {"commentId":5920442,"threadId":"526744","contentId":"2542581","authorDomain":"denise-lonestar"}
                                                    • 1 vote
                                                    Reply#19 - Fri Mar 13, 2009 2:24 PM EDT
                                                    {"commentId":5920485,"authorDomain":"mrclifton"}

                                                    A few points that jump out at me............

                                                    1) IF it was related to dad's previous drug mess, why wouldn't the kidnapper take the more easily accessable child, ie, Ron Jr. sleeping in another room? Why take the child supposedly sleeping in the same room with an adult and risking the chance of waking said adult.

                                                    2) IF it was a custody/parental abduction situation, both kids would have been taken.

                                                    3) And this is the one that jumps straight away at me, Why in god's name would a "kidnapper" turn on a LIGHT? I may watch too much tv but I've NEVER seen that before!

                                                    My money's on the new wife/Dad.

                                                    {"commentId":5920485,"threadId":"526744","contentId":"2542581","authorDomain":"mrclifton"}
                                                    • 1 vote
                                                    Reply#20 - Fri Mar 13, 2009 2:26 PM EDT
                                                    {"commentId":5922911,"authorDomain":"atlcpl30s"}

                                                    From what I heard Junior was sleeping the the bed with Misty.

                                                    {"commentId":5922911,"threadId":"526744","contentId":"2542581","authorDomain":"atlcpl30s"}
                                                    • 1 vote
                                                    #20.1 - Fri Mar 13, 2009 4:18 PM EDT
                                                    Reply
                                                    {"commentId":5920521,"authorDomain":"smammone1"}

                                                    I believe that the rule about being forced to testify against a spouse is only relevant from the time of the marriage not before.

                                                    {"commentId":5920521,"threadId":"526744","contentId":"2542581","authorDomain":"smammone1"}
                                                      Reply#21 - Fri Mar 13, 2009 2:28 PM EDT
                                                      {"commentId":5920553,"authorDomain":"justmeinms"}

                                                      living in a trailer does not make this family trash ... getting married at a time like this is defiantely strange and unusual and i too find something about misty's store fishy.. but i dont consider ronald to be a child predator jsut becasue he is dating a 17 year old he is only 25 to me that is not the worst thing in the world age is just a number and i have seen people with larger age differences and noone seems to mind . so the age thing i dont agree with but the mysterious story of the disapearance i totally find it to be strange

                                                      {"commentId":5920553,"threadId":"526744","contentId":"2542581","authorDomain":"justmeinms"}
                                                        Reply#22 - Fri Mar 13, 2009 2:29 PM EDT
                                                        {"commentId":5929972,"authorDomain":"jcspassion"}

                                                        justmeinms: I don't believe that people are calling them trailer trash because they literally live in a trailer. I believe that people are calling them trailer trash because they act like trailer trash. They definitely are exhibiting bizarre behaviors, putting on aires, and pretending to be something they aren't. Also, you don't consider Ronald to be a child predator, I hope that's true, but predators don't look like scary monsters are having markings to make them visible. Predators look just like everyone else. I am sure that no one believed that Dennis Radar was the BTK Killer either...a father/husband, good neighbor who would help out anyone who needed it, and a solid church going man.
                                                        Looks are deceiving.
                                                        I think the age difference is a little weird, but there was a time even in our history when young teenage (sometimes preteen) girls were married off to men considerably older then they were. The problem here is that Misty is underage. She has not reached the legal age limit to be considered an adult able to fully make her own decisions.
                                                        I feel those two want media attention focused on them. If they didn't, again, why the marriage now? Why did Ronald get into Gerald Rivera's face during an interview? Just as everyone has already stated, something is definitely not right about those two and this situation.

                                                        {"commentId":5929972,"threadId":"526744","contentId":"2542581","authorDomain":"jcspassion"}
                                                          #22.1 - Sat Mar 14, 2009 1:47 AM EDT
                                                          Reply
                                                          {"commentId":5920803,"authorDomain":"bobbil36"}

                                                          I have a daughter around the same age as Haleigh. There would be no way in God's name that I would marry anyone and I mean anyone for ANY reason (CMT960431) if my daughter was missing. It just wouldn'thappen. I would be out everyday looking for my daughter and it would not stop even for a wedding of my sister, mother or best friend. They are obviously people of very little class and education and did not care very much for that little girl. They know what happened to her and had something to do with it, if not they would be searching insead of playing around NY with pins on!!!

                                                          {"commentId":5920803,"threadId":"526744","contentId":"2542581","authorDomain":"bobbil36"}
                                                          • 1 vote
                                                          Reply#23 - Fri Mar 13, 2009 2:41 PM EDT
                                                          {"commentId":5920825,"authorDomain":"snowwulf6"}

                                                          Okay, if we are all saying and thinking the same thing, hopefully, law enforcement down in Florida also have the brains God gave a goat and will pick up on all these glaring oddities.

                                                          Having also lost a child myself ( although he was murdered and I at least know where is is buried- how sad is that, that I can be grateful I at least know where he is... and my condolences and prayers to those going through this nightmare now) I was barely functioning for months- romance and holiday trips were certainly the LAST thing on MY mind or my husbands- not to mention, WHY AREN'T THEY OUT THERE SEARCHING FOR THAT POOR CHILD????? Who in there right mind would be able to leave the town, let alone the state, while their child was out there, somewhere, maybe suffering and waiting for her daddy to come save her??? FOR SHAME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

                                                          On a side note- marrying a teenager- creepy, creepy, creepy.

                                                          {"commentId":5920825,"threadId":"526744","contentId":"2542581","authorDomain":"snowwulf6"}
                                                            Reply#24 - Fri Mar 13, 2009 2:43 PM EDT
                                                            {"commentId":5922679,"authorDomain":"AmethystWoman"}

                                                            Kim,

                                                            I am sorry you have survived such a terrible ordeal. I think the fact that you have been thru this yourself and you don't get it, means more than anything I could ever say.

                                                            As you say, they should be besides themselves...it's only been weeks!

                                                            {"commentId":5922679,"threadId":"526744","contentId":"2542581","authorDomain":"AmethystWoman"}
                                                              #24.1 - Fri Mar 13, 2009 4:07 PM EDT
                                                              {"commentId":5927802,"authorDomain":"clintvanzandt"}

                                                              Kim,

                                                              I am sorry for your loss. Who better than you could suggest how someone would "normally" respond to the loss of their child. My experience investigating kidnappings is that I usually encountered parents like you and your husband, couples that were shell shocked when their child was first kidnapped, and were afraid to even leave their home for lunch for fear their child would call or somehow show up and they not be there to greet their missing child.

                                                              While no one can suggest what the behavior of another should be, there are certain standards of response that are normal and what we see from Ron and his new bride do not fit that known standard.

                                                              Regards,

                                                              CVZ

                                                              {"commentId":5927802,"threadId":"526744","contentId":"2542581","authorDomain":"clintvanzandt"}
                                                              • 1 vote
                                                              #24.2 - Fri Mar 13, 2009 9:34 PM EDT
                                                              Reply
                                                              {"commentId":5920893,"authorDomain":"denise-dominguez"}

                                                              I saw the interview today and now I'm convinced there is something they are both hiding. There were a few occasions where it seemed evident that Misty has been coached by Ronald Cummings.

                                                              Ex: When Misty was asked by Viera about the change in story. Misty elbowed Ronald (playback this interview and watch). Following the nudge, she looked right up at him as if to ask him how to respond. It was so clear that it was creepy. He stayed as straight as a rod. It was clear as ever that he has coached her. Also he referred to his daughter as "his girl", then quickly changed it to my daughter. Although this is not a big deal, he was aware that it sounded off, and quickly corrected himself. Another odd statement from MIsty was that she "washed her, no our blankets, and put it over Haleigh". I never heard her say this before so just maybe this blanket is what the police have been looking for in the woods yesterday.

                                                              Ronald is so smug and looks as though he could lose his temper quickly. I believe he might have some connections in the police department. I think I heard that his mother had worked for the department but not sure.

                                                              {"commentId":5920893,"threadId":"526744","contentId":"2542581","authorDomain":"denise-dominguez"}
                                                                Reply#25 - Fri Mar 13, 2009 2:46 PM EDT
                                                                {"commentId":5926125,"authorDomain":"jbirdncsmiles"}

                                                                To dee-960490 I agree that Ronald looks very "smug" and did mention a certain detective very matter-of-factly, however it appears more detectives are getting involved, and I don't think it's by chance. No wonder Misty did not like the "New" detective. No matter if his mother did work for the department at some point, this has grown far to big to cover up! Can't wait to see how "Smug" he looks as everyone is chanting "Dead Man Walking".

                                                                {"commentId":5926125,"threadId":"526744","contentId":"2542581","authorDomain":"jbirdncsmiles"}
                                                                • 1 vote
                                                                #25.1 - Fri Mar 13, 2009 7:15 PM EDT
                                                                {"commentId":5935977,"authorDomain":"denise-dominguez"}

                                                                Janette, you are so right. The only concern I have is the marriage. In the interview when asked if Ronald was pleased with the investigation so far. His response was "so far". I wondered if the reason for the marriage is for the purposes of not testifying against each other, from this moment on. In other words, IF the detectives find anything now, and or new witnesses come into play, can they use the husband/wife priviledge from this point on? Ronald's response "so far" made me think he was going to turn the corner soon IF the detectives came full circle back to him and his teenage wife. This guy may not be educated but he seems quite slick and was able to get full custody of his kids, so he obviously understands some part of the legal system.

                                                                Also, did anyone see the interview, not the one on the Today show, where Ronald says to Misty, "look into the camera".

                                                                Last evening, they had the attorney for the biological mom on briefly. She said she has turned over pages of witnesses of the abuse Ronald has done to his chilfdren. Did anyone hear anymore on this?

                                                                {"commentId":5935977,"threadId":"526744","contentId":"2542581","authorDomain":"denise-dominguez"}
                                                                • 1 vote
                                                                #25.2 - Sat Mar 14, 2009 2:06 PM EDT
                                                                Reply
                                                                Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 4
                                                                {"canLink":false,"threadId":"526744","isPrivate":false}
                                                                Leave a Comment:
                                                                You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                                                As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                                                                {"threadId":"526744","contentId":"2542581"}
                                                                Start TrackingStart Tracking
                                                                Stop TrackingStop Tracking
                                                                RSS feedSyndicate this contentRecent Articles & Seeds
                                                                {"numToShow":"25","section":"clintvanzandt","moduleId":2842,"moduleOptions":"a,v,x,25,t,a,1"}
                                                                Clint Van Zandt's Latest Comments
                                                                Comments & Feedback
                                                                – Show More